A) The court ruled that the implied warranty of title did extend to subsequent purchasers.
B) The court ruled that the implied warranty of title did not extend to subsequent purchasers.
C) The court ruled that the implied warranty of title extended only to subsequent purchasers who purchased within 12 months.
D) The court ruled that the implied warranty of title extended only to the first three subsequent purchasers,but no further.
E) The court ruled that the implied warranty of title extended only to subsequent purchasers who purchased within 4 years.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) A buyer may waive express warranties but not implied warranties.
B) A buyer may waive implied warranties but not express warranties.
C) A buyer may waive express warranties and the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose,but not the implied warranty of merchantability.
D) A buyer may not waive warranties.
E) A buyer may waive both express warranties and implied warranties.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) That the plaintiff could recover based upon the implied warranty of merchantability because even though bones are not a foreign substance in fish,they are not expected in small pieces of tuna fish.
B) That the plaintiff could not recover because the bone was not a foreign substance to the fish and should have been expected.
C) That the plaintiff could not recover because no food has warranties attached to it.
D) That the plaintiff could recover based upon the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.
E) That the plaintiff could recover based on an express warranty.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) No,because only the manager can make such a warranty.
B) Yes,but only because Kristin verbally made certain promises.
C) Yes,because there was a reasonable expectation of how the vehicle would perform.
D) No,because there was no writing guaranteeing the warranty signed by the salesperson.
E) No,because Kristin was only engaged in puffing.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Warranties which are enforceable because they come from written guarantees.
B) Warranties which provide a very short time for a buyer to buyer a cause of action.
C) Warranties which protect sellers by limiting situations in which buyers can bring suit.
D) Warranties which arise out of the UCC,rather than the common law.
E) Warranties which give the buyer a longer time to bring suit.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) A seller must provide at least an express,limited warranty.
B) A seller must provide at least an implied,limited warranty.
C) A seller must provide an express,full warranty.
D) A seller must provide an implied,full warranty.
E) The act does not require that the seller provide any warranties.
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 81 - 90 of 90
Related Exams